A proposed amendment to Communities in Motion 2035 is currently open for public comment; comments will be accepted through noon, Wednesday,
September 4, 2013.
The proposed amendment
would add two projects to the “funded” list of projects in CIM 2035 – road
widening on Eagle Road in Meridian and design of a road widening project on US
Highway 20/26 near Caldwell. (Technically, the US 20/26 project would be listed
as “partially funded,” since only the design work – not construction – is
proposed for funding through this amendment and the project only encompasses
part of the corridor.)
CIM 2035 has already
been amended twice to add four other projects to the “funded” list of projects
in the plan – rebuilding Interstate 84 interchanges at Gowen Road, Broadway
Avenue, and Meridian Road, and widening Interstate 84 between Gowen Road and Broadway
Avenue.
So, what’s up? Why do we
keep amending CIM? After all, it will be updated next year, and we haven’t
amended our other long-range transportation plans this frequently. CIM 2030 was
only amended once, to add just one project. Why so many amendments now?
If a transportation
project is going to be funded with federal funding it must be listed as
“funded” in the long-range transportation plan, be included in the Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and potentially undergo an air
quality conformity demonstration. However, long-range transportation plans must
be fiscally constrained, meaning we can only plan for, or list as “funded,”
projects that our financial projections show we can reasonably afford.
Everything else must be placed on an “unfunded” list, meaning that the need has
been identified, but there isn’t funding to pay for it. Some projects also end
up on a “partially funded” list meaning that only part of a larger project or
corridor is funded (if the CIM 2035 amendment is approved, US 20/26 will be on
a “partially funded” list because the project proposed for funding is narrower
in scope than what is listed in the plan). When financial situations change,
plans need to be amended to reflect that.
That is what is
happening with CIM 2035. The plan was adopted in 2010, and its financial
forecast was developed in 2009. The financial situation was tenuous in 2009 and
the financial forecast was bleak. The number of projects funded in the plan was
significantly reduced from the previous plan.
However, two things have
happened since then. First, the “Great Recession” caused construction prices to
drop, in some cases significantly. This resulted in cost savings, meaning
projects came in under budget, which left “extra” money that could be put
toward previously unfunded projects. This was the case with the three interchange
reconstruction projects. Second, as the economy has rebounded, development has
picked up. The new Meridian Town Center development at the corner of Fairview
Avenue and Eagle Road, under development now after delays due to the recession,
is what spurred the need for the widening along Eagle Road.
Interestingly enough, this
same Meridian Town Center development is what triggered the need for the same
widening project on Eagle Road and the amendment to CIM 2030; however, when the
economy crashed the development, and the widening project, were delayed, and
the project reverted to “unfunded” in CIM 2035. The development is now
underway, and the widening is again scheduled, triggering the proposed amendment.
Most of the project is initially being funded by the developer, who will later
be paid back through “Sales Tax Anticipation Revenue.” You can learn more about
this at http://www.compassidaho.org/prodserv/cim2035.htm.
Widening US
20/26 came about for a different reason altogether, though economic conditions
and opportunities have set the stage. In a proposed agreement with the City of
Caldwell, the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), who manages US 20/26,
would widen the road between Smeed Parkway and Middleton Road and the City of
Caldwell would take over long-term maintenance of a different ITD road – a
business loop route through Caldwell. This proposed agreement has allowed the
US 20/20 project to move into the design phase and helps ITD fulfill its
mission of enhancing mobility and supporting economic opportunities. The
project will support economic growth in the city’s new Foreign Trade
Zone. Design work for the US Highway 20/26 widening project will begin in
2014; however, construction for this project is not yet funded.
However, CIM will be
updated next year. Why don’t we just wait and add the projects then? The short
answer is, “we can’t.”
Projects with federal
funding cannot be initiated unless they are in the TIP. Projects cannot be
added to the TIP without first being listed in the long-range transportation
plan as part of the “funded” transportation system. Projects must appear in the
TIP when they are scheduled and budgeted – whenever an agency will begin to
spend funds on that project, even if the funds are not for the actual
construction, such as the case with this US 20/26 amendment. So, if an
unanticipated project is scheduled to occur in the near future and belongs in
the TIP, CIM must be amended first. It can’t wait for a regularly scheduled CIM
update.
Confusing? Yes.
Bureaucracy? Maybe. But the process serves a purpose – it ensures that improvements
are carefully considered, prioritized, and planned, and that public input is
considered, prior to making decisions on projects that cost millions of dollars
and affect the lives of everyone using the transportation system. Please take
time to submit your comments on proposed CIM 2035 amendment by September 4.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. Someone will review and approve as soon as possible.